Cases 81 - 90 of 2,932
Lightfoot et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2016cv09303
Plaintiff:
Shelia D. Lightfoot and Franklin Q. Lightfoot
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henry et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2016cv09241
Plaintiff:
Mary Henry and William M. Henry
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cechinel et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2016cv09191
Plaintiff:
Filomena Cechinel and Sandro Cechinel
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2016cv09159
Plaintiff:
Naweeta Edwards and Ronald Shropshire
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC , Coloplast Corp. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09168
Plaintiff:
Olga Sanchez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09001
Plaintiff:
Deborah Kay Carr
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Mentor Worldwide LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08830
Plaintiff:
Martha Shell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ball et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08047
Plaintiff:
Dianna Ball and Michael Ball
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gleixner et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv07985
Plaintiff:
Maureen Gleixner and Robert Gleixner
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castellow et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07756
Plaintiff:
Janet Castellow and Harry D. Castellow
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Mentor Worldwide LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
