Cases 81 - 90 of 175,721
Renee Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-3480
Plaintiff:
RENEE LYNN MILLER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Flairwood Cabinetry
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Flairwood Cabinetry
Defendant:
United States, United States Trade Representative, U.S. Trade Rep. Katherine C. Tai and others
Crawford v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Brian Crawford
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Joesting v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00314
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Tracey Joesting
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lofthouse v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01208
Plaintiff:
Teresa Lofthouse
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Murray v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Constance Murray
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brian Swanson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-11846
Petitioner:
BRIAN D. SWANSON
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Payne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Ashlee Rosette Payne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nichols v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Matthew Nichols
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lockridge v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06211
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gerard Lockridge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
