Cases 81 - 90 of 341
Cook v. USA
as 3:2018cv00382
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Wesley Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Cook's Pest Control, Inc.
as 2:2018cv02337
Defendant:
Cook's Pest Control, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Melanie Jones
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parry v. Cook's Pest Control, Inc.
as 2:2018cv02338
Defendant:
Cook's Pest Control, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lisa Parry
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lippett v. Cook's Pest Control,Inc
as 2:2018cv02340
Defendant:
Cook's Pest Control,Inc
Plaintiff:
Yvette Lippett
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Cook's Pest Control, Inc.
as 2:2018cv02339
Defendant:
Cook's Pest Control, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Camika Jones
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook v. Chapman, et al
as 2:2018cv02301
Petitioner:
Bridgette Cook
Respondent:
Arvil Chapman, West Tennessee Detention Facility and Grand Prairie DSCC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McNeil et al v. Community Probation Services, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
Karen McNeil , Lesley Johnson , Tanya Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Community Probation Services, LLC, Community Probation Services, L.L.C., Community Probation Services and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Cook v. Graham et al
as 3:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jamie William Cook
Defendant:
Dennis Graham, Josh Berrong and Monroe County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. COOK et al
as 2:2018cv02108
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY JEAN TAYLOR
Defendant:
JONATHAN LEE COOK and SPECIALTY HAULERS LLC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Acklin et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00028
Plaintiff:
Paige Acklin , Steve Acuff , Michael L. Adkison and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
