Cases 81 - 90 of 90
Brothers v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00809
Plaintiff:
James Brothers, II
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, City of Dallas, Georgia, Huff and others
Morefield v. Sellers et al
as 1:2012cv01213
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Morefield, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Sellers, Mark Pilgrim, Michael Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferrell v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2010cv03515
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Ferrell
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Georgia Department of Corrections, Phillips State Prison Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Keller et al
as 1:2010cv03470
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Gordon
Defendant:
Keller, Vasquaz, Unknown Correctional Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardenas v. Warden et al
as 1:2010cv00596
Plaintiff:
Alejandro G. Cardenas
Defendant:
Warden and Atlanta Bureau Correctional Officers
Caves v. Operations Captian (Name Unknown) et al
as 1:2009cv02610
Plaintiff:
Clayton B. Caves
Defendant:
Operations Captian (Name Unknown), Tyrone Lemons, David Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Waters v. Philbin et al
as 7:2009cv00087
Plaintiff:
Willie Waters
Defendant:
Ted Philbin, William Danforth, Calvin Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caves v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv02658
Plaintiff:
Clayton Bryant Caves
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Senior Warden (Name Unknown), Operations Captain (Name Unknown) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Zenk et al
as 1:2008cv01923
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Ford
Defendant:
Michael Zenk, Carlus Worthy, Neel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Hudson et al
as 2:2008cv00048
Plaintiff:
Alfred Wayne Lee
Defendant:
D. Hudson, Other Unnamed Federal Correctional Officers, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
