Cases 81 - 90 of 166
VANDIVERE et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv01594
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOW VANDIVERE and JON KARL THOMPSON
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH , ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , THOMAS KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER-EVANS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2016cv01118
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MILLER-EVANS
Defendant:
KANITA C. WILLIAMS and CHIEF OF POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONROE-EVANS v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv01081
Plaintiff:
SHIRLONDA MONROE-EVANS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BEDDINI v. FORTY FORT BOROUGH CODE ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2016cv00853
Plaintiff:
JANET LINDA BEDDINI
Defendant:
FORTY FORT BOROUGH CODE ENFORCEMENT, JOSEPH S. TOCYDLOWSKI, JR., MELISSA C DIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
O'DIAH v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2016cv00336
Plaintiff:
AROR ARK O'DIAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SKALKA et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
AARON SKALKA , EMMA SKALKA , EVAN LEE and others
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ and JOHN F. KERRY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
EVANS et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2015mc01854
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN L. EVANS and DELORES H. EVANS
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
COVEY RUN, LLC v. WASHINGTON CAPITAL, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01997
Plaintiff:
COVEY RUN, LLC
Defendant:
WASHINGTON CAPITAL, LLC, JEMEL M. LYLES, SR., MELVIN H. SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WRIGHT v. GOSNELL et al
as 1:2015cv01950
Plaintiff:
JAMES WRIGHT
Defendant:
JAMES GOSNELL, JR., ANDREW EVANS and ASHLEY PENNINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
