Cases 81 - 90 of 254
Huerta v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv00988
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Huerta
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Oliver, Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Washington v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv00483
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Washington
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Penitentiary Administrative Maximim - A.D.X. and Federal Bureau of Prison, North Central Regional Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv00277
Plaintiff:
Seifullah Chapman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Oliver, Frankie Cordova and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McBee v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv03215
Plaintiff:
Richard McBee
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuals, Charles (I) Samuals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutter v. Goetz
as 1:2016cv02552
Plaintiff:
Shawn Louis Sutter
Defendant:
Goetz and Admin Staff Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanchez v. Tancil et al
as 1:2016cv01963
Petitioner:
Baldemar Elida Sanchez
Defendant:
M.A. Tancil and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The
as 1:2016cv01754
Plaintiff:
Dwight D. York
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coppage v. Brockman et al
as 1:2016cv01641
Plaintiff:
Davon Coppage
Defendant:
Brockman, Brzan, J. Shumard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv00996
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Carol Lindgren and Ricard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv00479
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and F. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
