Cases 81 - 90 of 96
Sampson v. Williams
as 5:2009cv01094
Petitioner:
Rodney Sampson
Respondent:
Greg Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allegro Biodiesel Corporation v. Dubroc et al
as 1:2009cv08037
Plaintiff:
Allegro Biodiesel Corporation
Defendant:
Darrell J. Dubroc, Tim A. Collins, William F. Wieger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Wilson v. Williams et al
as 5:2009cv00942
Plaintiff:
Timothy A Wilson
Defendant:
Greg Williams, James Walls and T McCollum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Williams
as 5:2009cv00860
Petitioner:
Jerry Wayne Bradford
Respondent:
Greg Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Williams
as 09-6159
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL EUGENE TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
GREG WILLIAMS
Anderson v. Williams
as 4:2009cv00414
Petitioner:
Richard Lloyd Anderson
Respondent:
Greg Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abrams v. Williams
as 5:2009cv00554
Petitioner:
Torrey Deon Abrams
Respondent:
Greg Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Eternal Hills Funeral Home et al
as 1:2009cv00781
Plaintiff:
Paul Holmes
Defendant:
Eternal Hills Funeral Home, Eunice M. Bolling, Greg Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Garrion v. Williams et al
as 5:2009cv00240
Petitioner:
Herbert Charles Garrion
Respondent:
Greg Williams and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holmes v. Eternal Hills Funeral Home et al
as 1:2009mi00058
Plaintiff:
Paul Holmes
Defendant:
Eternal Hills Funeral Home, Eunice M. Bolling, Greg Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
