Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 491
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Huntington Partnership et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv02136
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: HUNTINGTON PARTNERSHIP, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. PM Partners, LLC et al
as 8:2021cv02137
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: PM PARTNERS, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Miramar-Park Towers 1, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv10031
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: MIRAMAR - PARK TOWERS 1, LLC, MIRAMAR- PARK TOWERS 2, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v.Pacific View et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv10030
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: PACIFIC VIEW, DAVID CLEMENTS, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. The 1994 11th Street Partners, LP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv10027
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: THE 1994 11TH STREET PARTNERS, L.P., DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, The 1994 11th Street Partners, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Landing Property Investments LLC et al
as 2:2021cv10028
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: LANDING PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Blackhall v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv02046
Petitioner: Jessie James Blackhall
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Pinecreek Investment Co et al
as 8:2021cv01936
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: PINECREEK INVESTMENT CO, PINECREEK PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. LGA Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv01937
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: LGA CORPORATION, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. SCCO College Properties, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv01935
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: SCCO COLLEGE PROPERTIES, INC., LAS PALMAS - FULLERTON II, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?