Cases 81 - 90 of 201
Clark v. Pierce et al
as 1:2018cv01563
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Deputy Warden David Pierce, John Doe (1-100) and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peace v. Lyons, Doughty & Veldhuis, P.A. et al
as 1:2018cv01443
Defendant:
Lyons, Doughty & Veldhuis, P.A., John Does 1-25 and Midland Funding LLC
Plaintiff:
Anjna Peace
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jacobs v. Premiere Credit of North America, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01132
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Premiere Credit of North America, LLC
Plaintiff:
Amelia Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. GC Services Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2018cv00705
Plaintiff:
Lakedia Johnson
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jaimes v. Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv00635
Plaintiff:
Josefina Jaimes
Defendant:
Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd. and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jacobs v. McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00311
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jacobs
Defendant:
McCarthy, Burgess & Wolff, Inc. and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sebela Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Mesora Pharma, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01805
Plaintiff:
Sebela Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Defendant:
Mesora Pharma, LLC, Pyramid Management, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Kokinda v. Koch Industries Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01531
Plaintiff:
Jason Kokinda
Defendant:
Koch Industries Inc., Tom Wolf, William R. Stoycos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. James et al
as 1:2017cv00880
Plaintiff:
Earl Hayes
Defendant:
James, John Doe # 1, John Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reybold Group of Companies, Inc. v. John Does 1-20
as 1:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
Reybold Group of Companies, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
