Cases 81 - 90 of 92
Ryidu-x v. Wolfe
as 1:2011cv00358
Plaintiff:
Malcom Maxwell Ryidu-x
Defendant:
John Wolfe , Inmate Commissary Supervisor , Foy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00297
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gerald v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2010cv02194
Petitioner:
Ronald Gerald
Respondent:
John Wolfe and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Outlaw v. Md. Dept. Public Safety & Corr. Services et al
as 8:2010cv01688
Plaintiff:
Aaron Outlaw
Defendant:
Md. Dept. Public Safety & Corr. Services, Michael Stouffer, John Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2010cv00771
Petitioner:
Ronald Gerald
Respondent:
John Wolfe and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Wolf et al
as 8:2010cv00563
Plaintiff:
Antwan Anderson
Defendant:
John Wolf, Allen Gang, Ofc. Balogun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Koppel et al
as 8:2009cv03224
Plaintiff:
Toby Payne
Defendant:
Robert Koppel, John Wolfe, John Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayberry v. Mayberry et al
as 1:2009cv02839
Plaintiff:
Carlos R. Mayberry
Defendant:
Gary Mayberry, Carlton Applewhite, John Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fullard v. Wolf et al
as 1:2009cv01401
Petitioner:
James A. Fullard, Sr.
Respondent:
John Wolf and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Wolf et al
as 8:2008cv03332
Petitioner:
Shelton L. Green
Respondent:
John Wolf and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
