Cases 81 - 90 of 115
Davis et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP
as 8:2014cv01752
Plaintiff:
Derinda L Davis and Steven A. Davis
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv21451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv60957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
DAVIS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00196
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff:
GINA L DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2013cv00774
Petitioner:
Robert L. Davis
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. CREWS
as 1:2013cv00121
Petitioner:
ROBERT L DAVIS
Respondent:
MICHAEL D CREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. CREWS
as 3:2013cv00557
Petitioner:
Robert L. Davis
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. CREWS
as 4:2013cv00281
Petitioner:
ROBERT L DAVIS
Respondent:
MICHAEL D CREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. CREWS
as 4:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS, MARGARET N KOVACS and PEGGY SOLA HOLANGEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Church of Brotherly Love of King's Table Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv24236
Defendant:
Church Of Brotherly Love King's Table Corporation, Anthony L. Davis and Margaret A. Davis
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
