Cases 81 - 90 of 344
MILLER v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2020cv00516
Plaintiff:
TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER and HELENE TONIQUE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, LISA MADIGAN, WESTWOOD COLLEGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
ACKLEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2020cv00621
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL L. BENEWAY, ANDREW K. CROFT, CRAIG J. DICK and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BROWN EL et al v. OPARAUGO
as 1:2019cv03804
Plaintiff:
C.O. GORDON, B.K. BROWN, II, J.L. BROWN and others
Defendant:
DENNIS OPARAUGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAGE v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019cv03675
Plaintiff:
LISA PAGE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BALLANTINE et al v. DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
as 1:2019cv03598
Petitioner:
LISA BALLANTINE and MICHAEL BALLANTINE
Respondent:
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
RISENHOOVER v. LAW OFFICES OF NEIL HARE et al
as 1:2019cv03511
Defendant:
SHELLEY HYMES, JULIAN LIN, LISA COLANGELO and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALMONS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 1:2019cv03253
Plaintiff:
LISA SALMONS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) doing business as AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GREENHILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03110
Plaintiff:
Lisa Greenhill
Not Yet Classified:
JESSIE K. LIU and WILLIAM BARR
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
