Cases 81 - 90 of 234
Steltz v. Adamson
as 6:2019cv00350
Defendant:
Lt. Robert Adamson
Plaintiff:
Adam Steltz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaefer v. Harris et al
as 3:2018cv02224
Defendant:
Unknown Washington County District Attorney, Wade Mutchler, Officer Coulson and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Warren v. WA-Co. Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2018cv01751
Defendant:
WA-Co. Sheriffs Office, Sgt. S. Siemiller, B. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Jay Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Carey et al
as 2:2018cv01618
Defendant:
B. Amsberry, Mitch Morrow, Kevin Brockcamp and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQueen v. Klamath County et al
as 1:2018cv01533
Defendant:
Klamath County, Klamath County Sheriff Dept. and Lt. Davidson
Plaintiff:
Mark Douglas McQueen, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01144
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pruitt et al v. The Santiam Correctional Institution et al
as 6:2018cv01119
Defendant:
Lt. Does 1-30, Mrs. Hendrix, Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Inmates Doe's 1-30 and Kenyo Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byam v. Cain et al
as 2:2018cv01030
Defendant:
C/O Barba, B. Cain, Capps and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jonathan Byam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Nelson et al
as 2:2018cv01007
Defendant:
Capt. S. Boston, H.O. J. E. Deacon, A. Eynon and others
Plaintiff:
James Donald Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00893
Defendant:
Lt. Archer, Steve Bruce, Dave Pedro and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn E. Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
