Cases 81 - 90 of 98
CEASAR v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2009cv00603
Petitioner:
MAURICE CEASAR
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OLUWASEGUN OBEBE, KATHY SOUVERAIN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WESBY et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00501
Plaintiff:
THEODORE WESBY, ALISSA COLE, ANTHONY MAURICE HOOD and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, EDWIN ESPINOSA, J. NEWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CEASAR v. CBS BROADCASTING INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00434
Plaintiff:
MAURICE CEASAR
Defendant:
CBS BROADCASTING INC., ABC INC., NBC UNIVERSAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2009cv00306
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN, LIEUTENANT, TALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DAVIS v. DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2008cv02037
Plaintiff:
MAURICE DELANE DAVIS
Defendant:
DC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEVON BROWN, DEBRA MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PITTMAN v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2008cv01382
Plaintiff:
MAURICE PITTMAN
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, ROY E. HOLT, LOREN GRAYER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MCDONALD v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv00739
Plaintiff:
MAURICE J. MCDONALD
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, RUTH JONES and OFFICE OF THE CLERK
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MCDONALD v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv00668
Plaintiff:
MAURICE J. MCDONALD
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, RUTH JONES and OFFICE OF THE CLERK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CEASAR v. ROSSTEAD
as 1:2008cv00350
Plaintiff:
MAURICE CEASAR
Defendant:
PAUL ROSSTEAD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PIMBLE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al
as 1:2008cv00344
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. PIMBLE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS, MICHELLE RHEE and ADRIAN FENTY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
