Cases 81 - 90 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
May v. Williams et al
as 2:2010cv00576
Defendant:
James G. Cox, John Daye, Jerry Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Bayard v. State Of Nevada et al
as 3:2009cv00487
Plaintiff:
Antwon Maurice Bayard
Defendant:
Nevada, State Of, Reno, City Of, Washoe, County Of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. USA
as 2:2009cv01764
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Maurice Donnell Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bayard v. Skolnik et al
as 3:2009cv00476
Petitioner:
Antwon Maurice Bayard
Respondent:
Howard Skolnik and State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mizrahi et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
as 2:2009cv01387
Plaintiff:
Maurice Mizrahi and Elaine Mizrahi
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and MortgageIt, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Bayard v. State of Nevada
as 3:2009cv00352
Petitioner:
Antwon Maurice Bayard
Respondent:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sadiq v. ChairSalling et al
as 2:2008cv01768
Plaintiff:
Usman Sadiq
Defendant:
Doria ChairSalling, Maurice J. Silva, Connie S. Bisbee and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pest Committee, et al., v. Miller
as 2:2008cv01248
Plaintiff:
Pest Committee, Tony Badillo, Jack Lipsman and others
Defendant:
Ross Miller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Neven et al
as 2:2008cv00852
Petitioner:
Maurice Shum Smith
Respondent:
Dwight Neven and Attorney General of Nevada
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
