Cases 81 - 90 of 113
Microsoft Corp. v. Sofer & Haroun LLP
as 1:2013mc00102
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corp.
Defendant:
Sofer & Haroun LLP
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
In Re: Rule 45 Subpoena issued to Sofer & Haroun regarding Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2013mc00100
Defendant:
Microsoft Corp.
In Re:
Rule 45 Subpoena issued to Sofer & Haroun regarding Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
I/P Engine, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2013cv00688
Plaintiff:
I/P Engine, Inc.
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Intellivision et al v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2013cv00674
Plaintiff:
Intellivision and Paul Hoffman
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chevron Corporation v. Donziger et al
as 1:2012mc00065
Defendant:
Javier Piaguaje Payaguaje, The Law Offices of Steven R. Donziger, Donziger & Associates, PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chevron Corporation
Respondent:
Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Blagman v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05453
Plaintiff:
Norman Blagman
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Amazon.Com, Inc., Google Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Microsoft Corporation v. Maven Technologies, LLC et al
as 6:2012cv06353
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Maven Technologies, LLC and Todd Wheaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
