Cases 81 - 90 of 323
Howard v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2018cv00159
Plaintiff:
John Howard, Jr.
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 7:2018cv00536
Plaintiff:
Mary Smith
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCarter v. Myers et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott McCarter
Defendant:
Walter Myers, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCarter v. Myers et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott McCarter
Defendant:
Walter Myers, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crenshaw v. Myers et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00169
Plaintiff:
Stephen Shawn Crenshaw
Defendant:
Walter Myers and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McRay v. Myers et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
Johnny Walter McRay
Defendant:
Walter Myers , Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
George v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Milton George
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nowell v. Myers et al(INMATE 3)
as 3:2017cv00873
Plaintiff:
Andy C. Nowell
Defendant:
Muscogee County Georgia, Columbus Georgia, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banville v. Myers et al
as 5:2017cv02148
Petitioner:
John Joseph Banville
Respondent:
Walter Myers and Steven T Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hardy v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 2:2017cv02024
Plaintiff:
Angela Hardy
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
