Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Smith v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2010cv01520
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Wendell M. France, Maryland Parole Commissions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00060
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coleman v. Maryland Parole Commission et al
as 1:2009cv00749
Plaintiff:
Leon Coleman
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission, Commissioner C. Beikert, T. Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Maryland Parole Commission et al
as 8:2008cv02931
Petitioner:
Kevin Lee Ward
Respondent:
Maryland Parole Commission and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02724
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv02295
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goodman v. Maryland Parole Commission et al
as 1:2008cv01337
Plaintiff:
Frederick L. Goodman
Defendant:
Maryland Parole Commission, David R. Blumberg, Michael Blount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Shearin et al
as 1:2008cv00623
Plaintiff:
Leon Coleman
Defendant:
Bobby Shearin, J. Michael Stouffer, Maryland Parole Commission & Division of Parole & Probation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. Maryland Parole Commission
as 8:2007cv02466
Petitioner:
James Clark
Respondent:
Maryland Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01471
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
