Cases 81 - 90 of 107
Stiner v. Metro Health Medical Center et al
as 1:2014cv00716
Plaintiff:
Carlthea Stiner
Defendant:
Metro Health Medical Center, Natalie M. Joseph, Stephen W. Tarmarkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manigault v. State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv00585
Plaintiff:
Khristan Manigault
Defendant:
State of Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Sharon Chilson, Cheri Raber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Samuels v. National Principal Group, LLC
as 1:2013cv02146
Plaintiff:
Natalie Samuels
Defendant:
National Principal Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Giffels v. PetSmart, Inc.
as 5:2013cv01974
Plaintiff:
Natalie Giffels
Defendant:
PetSmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeMarco v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv01349
Plaintiff:
Natalie DeMarco
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ruiz-Bueno, III et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2012cv00809
Plaintiff:
John C Ruiz-Bueno, III and Michael Anthony Gay
Defendant:
Zack Scott, Franklin County Corrections Center II, Doug Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22676
Plaintiff:
Natalie Howard
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22510
Plaintiff:
James Todd Robertson and Natalie Robertson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Geiger v. Vermillion et al
as 3:2012cv02097
Plaintiff:
Robyn Geiger
Defendant:
Natalie Vermillion, Maha Laxmi, LLC and Shell Oil Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
