Cases 81 - 90 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01810
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Guerrero v. FJC Security Services Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv07216
Plaintiff:
Donnell Guerrero
Defendant:
FJC Security Services Inc., New York City Human Resources Administration, Local 32BJ, SEIU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Spencer v. Doar et al
as 1:2009cv04737
Plaintiff:
John Spencer
Defendant:
Robert Doar, New York City Human Resources Administration, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carver v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv03677
Defendant:
Alan D. Aviles, Michael R. Bloomberg, Robert Doar and others
Plaintiff:
Walter E. Carver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Uzamere v. Bush, et al
as 1:2008cv00891
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Condoleeza Rice, Michael Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv06153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
McBride v. New York City Human Resources Administration
as 1:2007cv02624
Plaintiff:
John E. McBride
Defendant:
New York City Human Resources Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv04435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
