Cases 81 - 90 of 106
Macleod v. State Of Florida et al
as 3:2013cv00606
Plaintiff:
Robert Craig Macleod
Defendant:
Pam Bondi and State of Florida Chief Legal Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BONDI v. SALMONSON
as 4:2013cv00294
Plaintiff:
PAM BONDI , JOHN T LUZZO and MICHAEL J SATZ
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ROBERT SALMONSON and FLORIDAUCC INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Washington v. Scott et al
as 2:2013cv14171
Plaintiff:
Bobby Glenn Washington
Defendant:
Rick Scott and PAM BONDI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farrell v. State of Florida Republicans et al
as 2:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lorne Farrell
Defendant:
State of Florida Republicans, Rick Scott, Pam Bondi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Timmon v. Scott et al
as 0:2013cv60330
Plaintiff:
Christine Timmon
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Pam Bondi, Will Weatherton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kessell v. Dixon et al
as 2:2012cv14402
Petitioner:
Phillip J. Kessell
Respondent:
Ricky Dixon and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castillo vs Tucker, et. al
as 0:2012cv62185
Plaintiff:
Angel Castillo
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avram v. Tucker et al
as 0:2012cv62184
Plaintiff:
Joseph Avram
Defendant:
Kenneth S. Tucker and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Tucker et al
as 0:2012cv61921
Plaintiff:
Courtney Donovan Wright
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker and Pam Bondi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Stranburg et al
as 9:2012cv80943
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Taylor
Defendant:
Marshall Stranburg, Pam Bondi, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
