Cases 81 - 90 of 106
Dunn et al v. Dubuque Glass Company, Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01001
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Dunn and Peter M. Hurm
Defendant:
Dubuque Glass Company, Inc and International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 81
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Sheryl Lockwood, Dan Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swehla v. State of Iowa
as 1:2010cv00158
Plaintiff:
Paul Peter Swehla
Defendant:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2010cv00536
Plaintiff:
Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jerry Bartruff, Dan Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters et al v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00142
Plaintiff:
Robert Peters , Michael Schalk, Chris Ralston and others
Defendant:
Kraft Foods Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Dyer v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2010cv00492
Plaintiff:
Aaron Dyer
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Michael Savala, Nick Ludwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2010cv00452
Plaintiff:
Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Dan Craig, Sheryl Lockwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2009cv00520
Plaintiff:
Dianna Lynn Peters
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
United States of America v. Finger et al
as 2:2009cv01040
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Clara Craig Finger, Peter S. Finger, Cheryl Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
United States of America v. Wright et al
as 4:2009cv00403
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rebecca Ann Wright, Joseph M. Cellucci, Parties in Possession and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
