Cases 81 - 90 of 3,506
Powell v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
Randall Powell
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv00613
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Powell
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sloan v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv00624
Plaintiff:
Danielle Sloan
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hubbard v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv00615
Plaintiff:
Kelli Hubbard
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dugan v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv00308
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Dugan
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
Nancy Cathryn Moore
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jennings et al v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2016cv12407
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Jennings, III and Lorene L. Hall-Jennings
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2016cv12410
Plaintiff:
Roy J. Smith and Christine Sue Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crouser v. E.I. Du Ponts Nemours and Company, et al
as 1:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Waunona Crouser
Defendant:
The Chemours Company , NCM Group Holdings, LLC, , Northstar Group Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Keaton v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2016cv09572
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Keaton
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
