Cases 81 - 90 of 101
Robert E. Coleman v. D. Palacios et al
as 2:2008cv02135
Plaintiff:
Robert E Coleman
Defendant:
D. Palacios, Beltran, Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Jones v Vanderville, et al
as 2:2008cv00251
Plaintiff:
Malik Jones
Defendant:
D. Vanderville, Corddack, A. Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Winzer v. R K Wong
as 2:2008cv00159
Petitioner:
Kenneth Winzer
Respondent:
R K Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raphael Rayford v. R K Wong
as 2:2007cv06981
Petitioner:
Raphael Rayford
Respondent:
R K Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNeal v. Ervin, et al
as 2:2007cv02240
Plaintiff:
Vernon Wayne McNeal
Defendant:
Ervin, Evert, R. K. Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Runnels, et al
as 07-16736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEWAYNE MCGEE RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
D. L. RUNNELS, M. D. MCDONALD, Associate Warden, T. FELKER, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Davis v. Felker, et al
as 2:2007cv01530
Plaintiff:
Bryan - Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
T. Felker, M. Townsend, R. K. Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Felker et al
as 2:2007cv01399
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Defendant:
T. Felker, M. D. McDonald, S Babbit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Marshall et al
as 2:2007cv00956
Plaintiff:
Tommy Ray Brown
Defendant:
G. Marshall, R. Gore, Quezada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Hill v. California Dept of Corrections & Rehabilitation/Prison Industry Authority et al
as 2:2007cv02623
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hill
Defendant:
California Dept of Corrections & Rehabilitation/Prison Industry Authority, Los Angeles County, City of Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
