Cases 81 - 90 of 98
GEICO Indemnity Company v. Robertson et al
as 1:2010cv00560
Plaintiff:
GEICO Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Leticia C. Robertson, S. A. B., Angela R. Mitchell and others
Counter_claimant:
Leticia C. Robertson, S. A. B., Angela R. Mitchell and others
Counter_defendant:
GEICO Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Jackson County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2010cv00522
Plaintiff:
Rundy Charles Robertson
Defendant:
Jackson County Adult Detention Center, Ken Broadus, Ray Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Pearson
as 5:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Robertson
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. Brown et al
as 2:2010cv00090
Plaintiff:
Russell T. Campbell
Defendant:
Chiquida Brown, Latoya Polk, Ashley Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Coleman
as 3:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
Audrey Denise Robertson
Defendant:
Minnie Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. USA
as 1:2009cv00784
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Will Robertson Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Robertson v. Bryant
as 1:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Robertson
Defendant:
Harold K. Bryant and Harold K. Bryant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Robertson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2008cv00030
Petitioner:
Audrey Denise Robertson
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Margaret Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Runnels v. Robertson
as 2:2007cv00298
Plaintiff:
Samuel R. Runnels
Defendant:
Russell Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson et al v. Wackenhut Corporation
as 5:2007cv00137
Plaintiff:
Kristen Anderson, Wanda Anderson, Angelia Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Wackenhut Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
