Cases 81 - 90 of 191
Maria Del Rosario Cepeda v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Rosario Cepeda
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
FILING ERROR
as 1:2018cv00031
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Rosario Cepeda
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Rosario v. Sifuentes
as 6:2017cv00331
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Michael Rosario, Jr.
Respondent:
P. Sifuentes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orocio et al v. Mi Cocina Ltd et al
as 4:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Marguerite Orocio , Roman Ramirez , Danielle Rice and others
Defendant:
Mi Cocina Ltd, MCrowd GP LLC, M Crowd Restaurant Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Gonzalez et al v. Mi Cocina LTD et al
as 3:2017cv02552
Plaintiff:
Flavio Gonzalez , Jesus Mares , Javier Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Mi Cocina Ltd, M Crowd Restaurant Group Inc and M Crowd GP LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Divins v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2017cv00599
Plaintiff:
Rosario Divins
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Jody Upton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00254
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consol_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00195
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Hinojosa, Jr. et al v. ASI Lloyds et al
as 5:2017cv00019
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds and Rosario Jose Lozoya, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Cloromiro Hinojosa, Jr. and Lorna Hinojosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
