Cases 81 - 90 of 268
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Brock v. Belt et al
as 5:2016cv00144
Plaintiff:
Dominique J. Brock
Defendant:
Troy Belt, Rodger Mitchell, Bruce Von Dwingelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris et al v. Moridge Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Ricky W. Morris and Susan Morris
Defendant:
Moridge Manufacturing, Inc. and Grasshopper Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ivy v. Leigh et al
as 4:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Marcus E. Ivy
Defendant:
Janice Leigh, Leslie Davis, Susan Chastain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Scarver et al
as 4:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Susan Scarver, Silas Scarver, Kail Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United Guaranty Commercial Insurance v. Despot
as 2:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
United Guaranty Commercial Insurance
Defendant:
Susan M. Despot
Counter_defendant:
Slovin & Associates Attorneys at Law, Student Loan Corporation, CitiAssist and others
Counter_claimant:
Susan M. Despot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SureTec Insurance Company v. J&S General Contracting, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
SureTec Insurance Company
Defendant:
J&S General Contracting, LLC, Susan Palmore, William J. Palmore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
