Cases 81 - 90 of 155
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez-Lecumberri et al v. AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01384
Plaintiff:
Ramon A. Mendez-Lecumberri and Abimael Rivera-Lopez
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Costello et al v. Home Depot, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01366
Plaintiff:
James D. Costello , Liza Logan , Matthew Picco and others
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Betancourt et al v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv01326
Plaintiff:
Maria T Betancourt , Debra M Pino-Betancourt and Beatriz R Pino-Betancourt
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Lopez v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01322
Plaintiff:
Maria Estela Lopez
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., AT & T of PR Inc. and AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
ERROR - NOT USED
as 3:2012cv01303
Plaintiff:
Maria Estela Lopez
Defendant:
Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1 and AT&T of Puerto Rico Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO
as 3:2012cv01254
Defendant:
Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
