Cases 81 - 90 of 102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01733
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv00203
Plaintiff:
KENNETH W. JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS , OFFICE OF THE CLERK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2011cv00175
Plaintiff:
LESTINA WALLACE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
BROWN et al v. FOGLE et al
as 1:2010cv02217
Plaintiff:
L. OLIVIA BROWN, B. K. BROWN, J. L. BROWN and others
Defendant:
ERICA FOGLE , LATEEFA SALAAM , ROQUE GERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. COBURN et al
as 1:2010cv01920
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN P. WALLACE
Defendant:
TOM COBURN, ROBERT L. WALKER, JAMES M. INHOFE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DEEN-MITCHELL v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv02069
Plaintiff:
WALLACE DEEN-MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSEBAR v. WALLACE et al
as 1:2009cv01873
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE ROSEBAR
Defendant:
ANTHONY WALLACE, HOME DEPOT, INC. and METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHARDSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv01856
Plaintiff:
T. CARLTON RICHARDSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, D.C. COURT OF APPEALS, ERIC T. WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
