Cases 81 - 90 of 243
Haider Abdulrazzak v. Attorney General of SD, et al
as 21-2738
Petitioner / Appellant:
Haider Salah Abdulrazzak
Respondent / Appellee:
Attorney General for the State of South Dakota and Brent Fluke, Warden at Mike Durfee State Prison
Ross v. Fluke et al
as 5:2021cv05045
Petitioner:
Travis Ross
Respondent:
Warden Brent Fluke and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Gomez v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 21-2686
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Jose Gomez
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert Dooley and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Harrison v. Fluke et al
as 5:2021cv05041
Petitioner:
Anthony Roy Harrison
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thunder v. Young et al
as 4:2021cv04099
Respondent:
Darin Young, Douglas Weber, Attorney General for the State of South Dakota and others
Petitioner:
Barry Glenn Thunder and Barry Glen Thunder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gomez v. Dooley et al
as 4:2021cv04085
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Petitioner:
Daniel Jose Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banghart v. Young et al
as 4:2021cv04066
Respondent:
Darin Young and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Petitioner:
Marty Joe Banghart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harcey v. Fluke et al
as 4:2021cv04036
Petitioner:
Eric Harcey
Respondent:
Warden Brent Fluke and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David John Asmussen v. Warden Darin Young, et al
as 21-1288
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Darin Young and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Petitioner / Appellant:
David John Asmussen
Kiir v. South Dakota State Penitentiary et al
as 4:2021cv04009
Petitioner:
Diw Bol Kiir
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota and South Dakota State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
