Cases 81 - 90 of 155
Candacy Roberts-Anderson et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01904
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Barnes, Toby Barnes, Linda Black and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
8th Wonder Entertainment, LLC et al v. Viacom International Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01748
Plaintiff:
8th Wonder Entertainment, LLC, Trisha Lum and Nickie Lum-Davis
Defendant:
Jim Ackerman, Toby Barraud, Does and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00550
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dethrone Royalty, Inc. v. Dethrone Royalty Holdings, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv05912
Plaintiff:
Dethrone Royalty, Inc.
Defendant:
Dethrone Royalty Holdings, Inc., Dethrone Beverages, Inc., To Sports Innovations, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Danylova et al
as 5:2013cv05838
Plaintiff:
California Casualty Indemnity Exchange
Defendant:
Rayisa Danylova, Mykhaylo Danylova, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05306
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Keith J Walker et al v. Riverside County Family Court et al
as 5:2013cv01992
Defendant:
Beaumont High School, Beaumont Police Dept, Beaumont Unified School District and others
Plaintiff:
Keith J Walker and Tariq A Walker
Tobie A Rodriguez v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 2:2013cv02332
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Tobie A Rodriguez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00502
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Schultz v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2013cv00901
Plaintiff:
Pamela Schultz
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Laurie Smith, John Hirokawa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
