Cases 81 - 90 of 99
Riley v. Morris et al
as 1:2007cv01185
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Riley
Defendant:
Chris Morris, Remben Hodge and Tommy Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2007cv01181
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Hill
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, George W. Little, Tommy Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2007cv01008
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Hill
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, George W. Little, Tommy Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Collins et al
as 1:2007cv01177
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Riley
Defendant:
Amanda Collins, Dennis Dean and Tommy Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Little et al
as 3:2007cv00744
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Sanders
Defendant:
George Little, Tommy Mills and C. Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Mills
as 3:2007cv00261
Petitioner:
Billy Joe Henderson
Respondent:
Tommy Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Mills
as 3:2007cv00695
Petitioner:
Joseph L. Johnson
Respondent:
Tommy Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Little et al
as 1:2007cv01117
Plaintiff:
Grady DeWayne Thomas
Defendant:
George Little, Roland Colson, Tommy Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Mills
as 1:2007cv01107
Petitioner:
Billy Henry
Respondent:
Tommy Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
March v. Mills et al
as 2:2007cv02296
Plaintiff:
Perry A. March
Defendant:
Tommy Mills, George Little, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
