Cases 81 - 90 of 1,675
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Moreno v. USA Intelligence et al
as 2:2022cv02129
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Moreno
Defendant:
USA Intelligence and USA Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wescott v. USA
as 2:2022cv02106
Petitioner:
Kenneth Gordon Wescott
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Crain v. Mercedes Benz USA et al
as 2:2022cv02080
Plaintiff:
Marc T. Crain
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz USA, Crain Automotive Team and First Security Bank
Indian Industries, Inc. v. Medal Sports (USA), LLC
as 2:2022cv02027
Plaintiff:
Indian Industries, Inc. doing business as Escalade Sports
Defendant:
Medal Sports (USA), LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Alvarado-Coronado v. USA
as 2:2022cv02022
Petitioner:
Ever Antonio Alvarado-Coronado
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pruitt v. USA
as 2:2022cv01941
Petitioner:
Brandon Lamar Pruitt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harrelson et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01933
Plaintiff:
Lori Harrelson and Richard Harrelson
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Chiochiu v. USA
as 2:2022cv01911
Petitioner:
Valerian Chiochiu
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
