Cases 81 - 90 of 366
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03995
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SABER v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. et al
as 2:2019cv03526
Defendant:
COMMON PLEAS COURT OF PHILADELPHIA and WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Plaintiff:
IDRIS ABDUS SABER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SABER v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. et al
as 2:2019cv03527
Petitioner:
IDRIS ABDUS SABER
Respondent:
COMMON PLEAS COURT OF PHILADELPHIA and WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COLON v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2019cv03131
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and JOHN DOES 1-3
Plaintiff:
OVIDIO COLON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Mallory v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 3:2019cv01235
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Beatriz I. Mallory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARBERA et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 2:2019cv03063
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
LINDA S. BARBERA and GARY M. BARBERA
IMAGE MASTERS, INC. et al v. ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INC.
as 2:2019mc00131
Petitioner:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, SUNTRUST BANK, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN FELDMAN
Defendant:
ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INC.
In Re:
IMAGE MASTERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Mallory v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 3:2019cv00744
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Beatriz I. Mallory
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.33 ACRES+TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.08 ACRES+ IN MOORE TOWNSHIP, NORTHHAMPTION COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA,TAX PARCEL NO.H4-8-7-38 et al
as 5:2019cv01134
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA INC., MOORE TOWNSHIP and others
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00653
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
