Cases 81 - 90 of 464
Davison v. NetCredit Loan Services, LLC
as 1:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Roger Davison
Defendant:
NetCredit Loan Services, LLC d/b/a NetCredit
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
The Amalgamated Sugar Company LLC v. Agri-Systems d/b/a ASI Industrial
as 1:2020cv00587
Plaintiff:
The Amalgamated Sugar Company LLC
Defendant:
Agri-Systems d/b/a ASI Industrial
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McHugh v Vertical Partners West
as 2:2020cv00581
Plaintiff:
Connie McHugh and Gilbert Fallen
Defendant:
Yuntong Power Co. LTD a.k.a. Zhongshan Electric Win Technology Co., Ltd. and Vertical Partners West, LLC d/b/a Venom Group International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Boston et al v. MAT-MERIDIAN LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00541
Defendant:
MAT-MERIDIAN LLC, MAT-BOISE LLC d/b/a The Matador, Opper Melang 5410 LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ivory Boston and Camron Wells
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rabidue v. Bonner County Administration, et al.
as 2:2020cv00529
Defendant:
Deputy J Thompson, Deputy D Oborn, Deputy Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Keith W. Rabidue and Keith W. Rabidue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Crow v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2020cv00518
Plaintiff:
Stanley D. Crow
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Woodie et al v. Farnsworth et al
as 1:2020cv00483
Defendant:
Ryan E. Farnsworth and Paul D. Ziel
Plaintiff:
Kymberly Woodie and Paul Woodie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
