Cases 81 - 90 of 23,498
Vargas v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01901
Plaintiff:
Rosa Vargas
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Olvera-Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jose Francisco Olvera-Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thompson v. The United States Of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:17-cr-566-3 & 4:17-cr-414-3
as 4:2024cv01892
Petitioner:
Charles Wendell Thompson
Respondent:
The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williamson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Richard Williamson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Gass v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Landon Gass
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
FILING ERROR
as 5:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel. Randall Molnar
Defendant:
Cadence McShane Construction Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Sollberger v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01873
Plaintiff:
John Sollberger
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Terry v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Terry
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00452
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Barrera
as 4:2024cv01852
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carlos Barrera
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
