Cases 81 - 90 of 86,733
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
White v. City of Utica et al
as 6:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Daryll White
Defendant:
City of Utica, Utica Police Department, P.O. Joseph Dare #1962 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jiang v. China Southern Airline Company Limited; et al
as 1:2024cv03558
Plaintiff:
Ziyao Jiang
Defendant:
China Southern Airline Company Limited;, Ministry of State of the P.R China and State Security Bureau of Guangzhou City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Megens-Sedor v. Priolo et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Alexander Megens-Sedor
Defendant:
Nicholas Priolo, Todd Baxter and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Megens-Sedor v. Priolo et al
as 6:2024cv06303
Plaintiff:
Alexander Megens-Sedor
Defendant:
Nicholas Priolo and Todd Baxter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
