Cases 81 - 90 of 6,828
KING v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv24762
Plaintiff:
ROBERT VINCENT KING
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS, HARRIS and CARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN D MOORE
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, APALACHEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTALVO v. LACKY et al
as 5:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
EFRAIM MONTALVO
Defendant:
LACKY, L BENTLEY, L BRASFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDDING v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2023cv24741
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL REDDING
Defendant:
GARY ENGLISH, R BETHEA, JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHIE v. HILL et al
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LEE ARCHIE, JR
Defendant:
OBRIAN ALEXAND HILL and CHIP SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACK v. BURDETT et al
as 3:2023cv24736
Plaintiff:
DEREK J MACK
Defendant:
BURDETT and BURNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FERNANDEZ v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
DR JOHNSON, RICKY DIXON, ARMOR CONTRACTED BY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. CENTURION et al
as 4:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
JAMAL ARTHERIO MILLER, SR
Defendant:
CENTURION, GILBERT NOE, PAUL A AIELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. CAMPBELL
as 5:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN PEREZ
Defendant:
CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSA v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
JULIO NEHOMAR ROSA
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
