Cases 81 - 90 of 495
Butler v. Signal Hill Telecom Services US Inc
as 2:2020cv00578
Defendant:
Signal Hill Telecom Services U.S., Inc. and Signal Hill Telecom Services US Inc
Plaintiff:
Richard Butler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Singletary v. AECOM
as 2:2018cv00372
Plaintiff:
Jerry Singletary
Defendant:
AECOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Ressa v. Murray/Reiff LLC
as 2:2020cv00031
Plaintiff:
Trisha C Ressa
Defendant:
Murray/Reiff LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perks v. SLI Technologies Inc
as 2:2020cv00095
Defendant:
SLI Technologies Inc
Plaintiff:
Brian George Perks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kim v. US Bancorp et al
as 2:2020cv00032
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, U.S. Bancorp, US Bancorp and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Kim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v New Main Chinese Buffet Inc, et al
as 3:2017cv06030
Defendant:
Ocean Sushi, Inc. dba Mika Japanese Buffet, New Main Chinese Buffet at Lacey, LLC dba Main Chinese Buffet, Hui Ru Dong and others
Plaintiff:
Secty of Labor R. Alexander Acosta and R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Goh v. Cross Recruiting Inc
as 2:2020cv00172
Plaintiff:
Hock Goh and Chris Goh
Defendant:
Cross Recruiting Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hutchman v. SR Building Services LLC
as 2:2020cv00171
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Hutchman
Defendant:
SR Building Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ross v. Pacific Maritime Association et al
as 2:2019cv01676
Defendant:
SSA Terminals, LLC, Pacific Maritime Association, Joint Port Labor Relations Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Marlena Ross
Intervenor Defendant:
International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local 19 and ILWU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freitas et al v. Heartland Express Inc of Iowa
as 2:2019cv00383
Defendant:
Heartland Express Inc of Iowa
Plaintiff:
Ryan Calvert and Gregg Freitas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
