Cases 81 - 90 of 6,840
BURKS v. MCWILLIAMS et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JAMAAL BURKS
Defendant:
LASQUBIA MCWILLIAMS, DEBBIE JONES, KELLEY WATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. LEWIS et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
CARL A WILLIAMS, II
Defendant:
BRITTNEY LEWIS, SESSIONS and RIOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOFF v. DUVALL
as 5:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
JAMES DAN GOFF
Defendant:
SCOTT DUVALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. IGO et al
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO WOODS
Defendant:
IGO and CRAFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN D MOORE
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, APALACHEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSA v. CHAIR COMMITTEE ON CODES OF CONDUCT
as 5:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
JULIO NEHOMAR ROSA
Defendant:
CHAIR COMMITTEE ON CODES OF CONDUCT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHIE v. ACEVEDO et al
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LEE ARCHIE, JR
Defendant:
JELO ACEVEDO and CHIP SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHIE v. HILL et al
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LEE ARCHIE, JR
Defendant:
OBRIAN ALEXAND HILL and CHIP SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSA v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
JULIO NEHOMAR ROSA
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSA v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
JULIO NEHOMAR ROSA
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
