Cases 1 - 10 of 17
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2021cv01012
Defendant:
AMY HOLMES, AMY MITCHELL and ALL UNKNOWN HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS OF DAVID E. GRIMES, DECEASED
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
ASBURY et al v. EQT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv01005
Plaintiff:
RONALD AND TRACY LOVRICH, DONALD AND JULIA NEWTON, JOSEPH AND AMY HEBDA and others
Defendant:
EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY, EQT MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P., EQT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
United States Of America v. Bittinger
as 4:2017cv01194
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Amy A. Bittinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CORVIN
as 2:2016cv01525
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AMY C. CORVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Schwartz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2014cv00276
Plaintiff:
Amy Schwartz
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Young et al
as 1:2013cv03111
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael B. Young and Amy J. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
United States of America v. Carey
as 1:2013cv00718
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amy S. Carey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471 Declaratory & Injunctive Relief - Foreclo
HAMMILL et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 1:2012cv00117
Plaintiff:
NEAL HAMMILL and AMY JO HAMMILL
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Martz
as 1:2012cv00686
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amy M. Martz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUGILL et al
as 3:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSEPH C. HUGILL and AMY B. HUGILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
