Cases 21 - 30 of 59
USA v. Andy Armas
as 17-10837
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDY ARMAS, a.k.a. Andy Armas Nunez
Geoffrey Anderson v. John Moore, et al
as 16-16562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEOFFREY H. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MOORE, Officer, CHARLES W. RUSSELL, Officer, JOHN FLYNN, Officer and others
:
SERVICE
Andy Maldonado v. USA
as 16-15508
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDY MALDONADO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Guillermo Duarte, Jr.
as 16-14898
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GUILLERMO DUARTE, JR., a.k.a. Jose Perez, a.k.a. Tato, a.k.a. Lazaro Rios, a.k.a. Andy Barrios
In re: Andy Pierre
as 16-14046
Petitioner:
In re: ANDY PIERRE
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Andy Pierre
as 16-12860
Petitioner:
In re: ANDY PIERRE
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gregory Packer v. Joy Todaro, et al
as 16-10444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY PACKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOY TODARO, ANDY LEVINE and JILL BESSEY PRINCE
Carolinas Electrical Workers R, et al v. Zenith American Solutions, Inc, et al
as 15-14046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROLINAS ELECTRICAL WORKERS RETIREMENT PLAN, GRAHAM BLACKBURN, Trustee, MIKE CRIBBS, Trustee and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ZENITH AMERICAN SOLUTIONS, INC., successor in interest to American Benefit Plan Administrators, Inc. successor in interest to Administrative Service, Inc., CLACK & ASSOCIATES, PC and AGH, LLC
:
SERVICE
USA v. Andy Pierre
as 15-12809
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDY PIERRE
Ernest Black, et al v. Jeff Wigington, et al
as 15-10848
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ERNEST EDGAR BLACK and AMY ELIZABETH BLACK, a.k.a. Amy Merritt
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT WILSON, JEFF WIGINGTON, Sheriff, ANDY STAMATELLOS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
