Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Louis v. Kuttner et al
as 1:2023cv01532
Plaintiff:
Roland Louis
Defendant:
Ludwig Kuttner, Louis Investment Properties, LLC, K Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Skeete v. Freeman et al
as 1:2022cv04929
Plaintiff:
Mark Skeete
Defendant:
Edwin Freeman, Jr, Edwin Freeman, Sr, Dorese Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Kondratiev v. Nelnet et al
as 1:2022cv01912
Plaintiff:
Kathrina Kondratiev
Defendant:
Nelnet, FedLoan Servicing, U.S. Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
FITZGERALD v. CHILD SUPPORT RECEIVER et al
as 5:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
DEWYAN RENARD FITZGERALD and SHARRIEF BEY
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE, SPENCER, CHILD SUPPORT RECEIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Roe et al v. Doe
as 1:2019cv03293
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Rachel Roe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Medlin et al
as 1:2019cv00029
Defendant:
Richmond County School System, Richmond County Board of Education, Jeanice Barrett and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Par North America et al
as 1:2018cv05814
Defendant:
Jane Doe, James Burns, Par North America and others
Plaintiff:
Cathi Miller
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Murphy v. Pars Auto Sales, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04933
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Pars Auto Sales, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tashawnna Murphy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Connected Technologies v. The Systems Depot Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04475
Plaintiff:
Connected Technologies
Defendant:
Elk Products Inc., John and Jane Does 1 through 4, Mr. Wade Moose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
