Cases 71 - 80 of 479
Thornton v. Oregon Department of Corrections Health Services et al
as 3:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
James Thornton
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections Health Services, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinsky v. Peters et al
as 6:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Pinsky
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Heidi Steward, Michael Gower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casarez-Cardoso v. Roberts et al
as 2:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
Miguel Casarez-Cardoso
Defendant:
Dr. Warren Roberts, J. Bugher, E. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Benavidez et al
as 6:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Ruben Benavidez, Richard Wallace, Garret Laney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Hendrix et al
as 3:2022cv00683
Plaintiff:
Keith Charles Harrison
Defendant:
DeWayne Hendrix and John and Jane Does 1-99
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Shelley v. Peters et al
as 6:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Tanner Elliott Shelley
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Heidi Steward, Brian Belleque and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Warren et al
as 6:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Nathan Warren and John and Jane Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lathrop-Vance v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Lathrop-Vance
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00557
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Heslen v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Nicolette Dawn Heslen
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Brian Belleque, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
