Cases 1 - 10 of 345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DOE v. Christ Church Georgetown et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
Christ Church Georgetown and Timothy Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
SEYEDSHARIFI v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv03426
Plaintiff:
SEYEDEH ZAHRA SEYEDSHARIFI
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, MARTINA STRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DOE v. BOZZUTO MANAGEMENT COMPANY
as 1:2023cv03360
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
BOZZUTO MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HALE EL v. MARTINEZ-THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv03114
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE EL
Defendant:
MICHELLE MARTINEZ-THOMAS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COLORADO and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. BURNS et al
as 1:2023cv02937
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. BURNS, DOUG VAN ZANDT, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
R.A. et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv02606
Plaintiff:
R.A., H.A., L.A. and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
