Cases 1 - 10 of 32
DOE v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02006
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
LYFT, INC. and NAOUFAL JELLALI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
WILLIAMS v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Njeri Williams
Defendant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LEWIS v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2022cv03148
Plaintiff:
IRVINA P. LEWIS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and JANE DOE
GRAY v. BAUM et al
as 1:2022cv01858
Plaintiff:
LINWOOD GRAY
Defendant:
PHILLIS BAUM, HEATHER LONG and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
GRAY v. LONG et al
as 1:2021cv02672
Plaintiff:
LINWOOD GRAY
Defendant:
HEATHER B. LONG, JANE DOE and KEVIN E. BEHRNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. CHUNG
as 1:2019cv03266
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
DAVID CHUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2019cv01298
Not Yet Classified:
JANICE L. COLE
Plaintiff:
Matthew Tsun and JANE DOE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BUSH v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2019cv00930
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mr. McDaniel K Brian
Defendant:
WMATA, JANE DOE and WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA BUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
DOE v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00903
Defendant:
RAUL E. RODRIQUEZ VASQUEZ, RASIER-DC, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEGLITZ et al v. BARRY et al
as 1:2018cv01555
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, James Barry, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 100 and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Steglitz and Laura Bry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
