Cases 41 - 50 of 725
Randall v. Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) et al
as 3:2023cv02502
Plaintiff:
Kimothy Randall
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC), Dr. Meyers, B. Blum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Condon v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv02461
Plaintiff:
Christopher Condon
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Justin Jurkowski, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Due v. Ahmed et al
as 3:2023cv02431
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
Faisal Vakil Ahmed, Mary A Noland, Syed Fateh Hyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wisnauski v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv02261
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wisnauski
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Travis Bayler, Dr. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v Blades et al
as 3:2023cv02221
Plaintiff:
Mark Davenport
Defendant:
Deb Bledsoe, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Percy Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinde v. Wooley et al
as 3:2023cv02197
Plaintiff:
Raymond Stinde
Defendant:
Sarah C Wooley, S Waiker, Joshua Schoenbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv02149
Plaintiff:
Darrian Daniels
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, C/O Choate, Officer Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeLong v. Morgonthaler et al
as 3:2023cv02111
Plaintiff:
Aaron DeLong
Defendant:
Richard Morgonthaler, Kimberly Hvarre, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Wills
as 3:2023cv02061
Plaintiff:
Darrian Daniels
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, C/O Choate, Officer Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox v. Bebout et al
as 3:2023cv01759
Plaintiff:
Ted Knox
Defendant:
Sgt. Bebout, Danny Lee, A. Dearmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
