Cases 61 - 70 of 92
Parker v. Wofford et al
as 1:2020cv00031
Defendant:
Jessica L. Johnson, Kelly N. Aspinall, Ephram Jeon and others
Plaintiff:
Dorsey S. Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gachanja v. Rowles et al
as 1:2019cv02154
Plaintiff:
Timothy K. Gachanja
Defendant:
Richard Cappelli, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Jessica Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Amor et al
as 1:2019cv02078
Defendant:
Kevin M. Slawin, Reid M. Huber, James M. Daly and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bellicum Pharamceuticals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jessica Amor and Mildred Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NNVI Investment LLC et al v. AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01900
Plaintiff:
NNVI Investment LLC, Nichol Hopper, Jessica Udelhofen and others
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Intervenor:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kent v. Sotheby's et al
as 1:2019cv01374
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Diana Taylor, Duke of Devonshire, Jessica Bibliowicz and others
Quality Care for Men Health MGMT, LLC et al v. Quality Care for Men, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00951
Defendant:
Rainstorm Media Group, Inc., Jessica Jones and Quality Care for Men, LLC
Plaintiff:
Stephen Sewalk and Quality Care for Men Health MGMT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01636
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Robinson v. Mills et al
as 1:2018cv01581
Defendant:
Jessica and Monica Mills
Plaintiff:
Marcus L. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kahr v. Clark et al
as 1:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Barry Kahr
Defendant:
William Clark, Ronald Cooper, George Siber and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
