Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GOODE v. A-CRUZ et al
as 2:2023cv02104
Petitioner:
RONALD GOODE
Respondent:
A-CRUZ, THOMAS M. ZALESKI, BRIAN WERNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HENSLEY v. SKERDA et al
as 1:2018cv00044
Petitioner:
JOSEPH HENSLEY
Respondent:
MAUREEN SKERDA, CALEB GNAGE and ELIZABETH ZIEGLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BYAM v. GORDON et al
as 2:2012cv02880
Petitioner:
MAUREEN MELISSA BYAM
Respondent:
MICHAEL GORDON, JON DAVID MAGA, THOMAS BRANCA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BYAM v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2011cv03635
Petitioner:
MAUREEN MELISSA BYAM
Respondent:
GIROUX, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BYAM v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2011cv03634
Petitioner:
MAUREEN MELISSA BYAM
Respondent:
GIROUX, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSEQUIST v. GIROUX et al
as 1:2011cv00119
Petitioner:
TERRI LEE ROSEQUIST
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX , MAUREEN SKERDA , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BYAM v. GORDON
as 2:2011cv02977
Respondent:
MICHAEL GORDON
Petitioner:
MAUREEN MELISSA BYAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSEQUIST v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2011cv01832
Petitioner:
TERRI LEE ROSEQUIST
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX, MAUREEN SKERDA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Creighton v. Fisher et al
as 3:2011cv00288
Petitioner:
Larry Creighton
Respondent:
Jon Fisher, Frank Campopiano, Maureen McGough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. BYAM
as 2:2011cv00281
Petitioner:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent:
MAUREEN MELISSA BYAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
