Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Creighton v. Fisher et al
as 3:2011cv00288
Petitioner:
Larry Creighton
Respondent:
Jon Fisher, Frank Campopiano, Maureen McGough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. BYAM
as 2:2011cv00281
Petitioner:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent:
MAUREEN MELISSA BYAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tepong v. Murphy et al
as 3:2010cv02656
Plaintiff:
Lor Tepong
Defendant:
Michael P Murphy, S.A. Nezezon, D Cadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANKO v. LAPPIN et al
as 4:2010cv00547
Plaintiff:
Rudy Stanko
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Herrell Watts, Michael K. Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BOND et al v. WISEMAN et al
as 2:2009cv04406
Plaintiff:
JESSE DERRICK BOND
Defendant:
MICHAEL WISEMAN, STUART LEV, MAUREEN KEARNEY ROWLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSH v. WISEMAN et al
as 2:2009cv04385
Plaintiff:
LARRY RUSH
Defendant:
MICHAEL WISEMAN, CRISTI CHARPENTIER, MAUREEN KEARNEY ROWLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Messina v. Doe et al
as 4:2009cv01342
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Messina
Defendant:
John Doe, Maureen Green and Denise Derol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
TYRONE-ANTHONY et al v. KNAUER et al
as 2:2009cv02796
Plaintiff:
TYRONE-ANTHONY, SANDRA HASSETE and WANDA DENISE HUNT
Defendant:
JULIE KNAUER, ARIAS, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bricker v. Harlow et al
as 1:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Michael W. Harlow, Fred J. Ruffo, William Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Cochran et al
as 1:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Johnnie L. Cochran, Jr., Ulysses Torey, Jose Ernesto Medellin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
